Artificial Variability
The flow of patients through the healthcare delivery system varies for two reasons – natural and artificial. The flow of Emergency Department (ED) patients is an example of natural variability. The reason ED flow is naturally variable is because the timing of patients’ arrival is primarily driven by the timing of sickness, which is naturally occurring. As compared with ED flow, the variability in the flow of elective scheduled patients is primarily artificial in nature and driven chiefly by scheduling practices. The magnitude of this artificial variability in elective flow often surpasses the natural variability in emergency department flow and wreaks havoc on the healthcare delivery system, particularly in hospitals. Take a look at the below chart showing one hospital’s emergency and elective scheduled admissions over a three month period and notice how the day to day variation in the two is almost comparable.
Artificial variability leads to unnecessary competition between elective and emergency patients resulting in
- Rejections, delays and cancellations
- Decreased quality of care and patient safety
- Decreased patient, staff and provider satisfaction
- Increased system-wide stress and waste
- Decreased throughput (i.e. number of patients), revenue, and patients’ access to care
- Increased healthcare cost
Artificial variability has negative effects for patients, providers and payers alike.
To address artificial variability, and to employ the science of Operations Management to design healthcare operations, faculty of the Institute for Healthcare Optimization developed an approach to manage patient flow variability. Artificial Variability and IHO’s recommended approach are described in great detail in Joint Commission Resources’ second edition of Managing Patient Flow in Hospitals: Strategies and Solutions and in the guidance document prepared for the California Healthcare Foundation.
Cost reduction through optimal patient Flow Variability Management Healthcare Cost Corner
Hospital costs can be decreased by millions of dollars annually by adopting the Institute for Healthcare Optimization’s approach to managing variability in healthcare delivery.
Case Study
See how Cincinnati Children’s Hospital increased annual revenue by $137M, and avoided $100M in cost, while improving quality of care.
Resources
Joint Commission Resources Book
The IHO’s approach to managing variability in healthcare delivery is the central theme of Joint Commission Resources’ new book.
See Commission ResultsIOM Report: Transforming Health Care Scheduling and Access
The Institute of Medicine (IOM) recommended IHO Variability Methodology as one of the six principles to address the compelling issue of access to healthcare.
Get the Report